Forum Technical Discussions Re: Is 2375 for UT designed to replace 2154? Posted by: David Harvey (PID_1427), E-mail: Address, on July 03, 2008 at 19:45 : In Reply to: Is 2375 for UT designed to replace 2154? posted by : Kiko , E-mail: Address, on July 03, 2008 at 13:45 : The short answer is, yes, it is the document intended by ASTM to replace 2154. For reference, go here: http://annex4.astm.org/BroadcastEmailAttachments/MIL_STD_2154_Notice_2_-_Cancellation.pdf ----------- Start Original Message ----------- : Is 2375 for UT designed to replace 2154? The step Down UT Standards required for Bar Stock drives cost up for inspecting them. Any other interpetrations that I am missing? ------------ End Original Message ------------ Follow Ups: Post a Followup: Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: ----------- Start Original Message ----------- : The short answer is, yes, it is the document intended by ASTM to replace 2154. : For reference, go here: : http://annex4.astm.org/BroadcastEmailAttachments/MIL_STD_2154_Notice_2_-_Cancellation.pdf : : : Is 2375 for UT designed to replace 2154? The step Down UT Standards required for Bar Stock drives cost up for inspecting them. Any other interpetrations that I am missing? ------------ End Original Message ------------ Optional Link URL: Example: "http://www....html". Alternative write "http://www.ndt.net/wshop/attach/filename.htm" if you transfered a filename.htm via FTP Page Title: is important! Optional Image URL: http://www....gif Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process Forum Technical Discussions Help